Pink Floyd RSS News Feed

Statistics

We have 4 guests online
Visitors: 82167881
Pink Floyd The Black Strat book by Phil Taylor
Nick Mason Inside Out signed copy
Brain Damage and A Fleeting Glimpse
Home arrow Interviews arrow Roger Waters interviews arrow November 2000 - Revolver Magazine
November 2000 - Revolver Magazine Print E-mail

Interview with TRENT REZNOR

THEY'VE CREATED SOME OF THE MOST PROFOUNDLY DEPRESSING MUSIC IN THE HISTORY OF ROCK, BUT ROGER WATERS AND TRENT REZNOR ARE JUST TICKLED PINK TO SHAKE HANDS

Roger Waters is waiting for Trent Reznor. "Presumably, they have to rouse him for a drug-induced coma," Waters remarks dryly. "These young rock stars..."

Just then Reznor turns up, and, far from being comatose, he seems well-rested and sharp. In fact, anticipation has driven him from bed at an hour most unbecoming a rock star. "I woke up at 7:30 this morning," he confides. "I was going, 'God, I'm gonna talk to Roger Waters today!'"

The dean of dramatic arena-rock drama meets the dark lord of industrial. As their conversation gains momentum, one can feel Waters' frosty reserve slowly melting. He and Reznor really are kindred spirits. They're both the sort who see the big picture, albeit a picture painted in somber tones. As the brooding masterminds behind Pink Floyd and Nine Inch Nails, respectively, Waters and Reznor hold a special place in the hearts of rock and roll misfits from ages, oh, 15 to 50. Pink Floyd's 1979 opus The Wall and NIN's 1994 album The Downward Spiral each depict the slow, agonized unraveling of a psyche -- Waters' and Reznor's own, in each case, though thinly veiled by a plot line. The Wall's Pink and The Downward Spiral's nameless protagonist ultimately lapse into bleak solipsism -- complete isolation from their fellow humans.

And that's how the public tends to think of both Reznor and Waters: withdrawn, melancholic, a wee bit misanthropic. Waters' acrimony towards his former bandmates in Pink Floyd is as legendary as Reznor's contempt for his former record label, TVT. As the moment, they're also a couple of guys with a bit of product to flog. Both are preparing DVDs of their recent live tours, both of which were grand rock spectacles. Waters is also scheduled to release a live album of his In The Flesh 2000 tour, while Reznor is coming out with Things Falling Apart, a CD of remixes from his most recent Nine Inch Nails album, The Fragile.

Revolver's motive in bringing these artists together for the first time was to open a dialog between two of rock's major thinkers. Besides, who could pass up the opportunity of introducing the artist responsible for Animals to the man who wrote, "I want to fuck you like an animal"?

Revolver: Trent, what role has Roger's music played in your own life and work?

Trent Reznor: I grew up on a farm in the middle of nowhere in Pennsylvania. Not to sound kiss-ass, but when The Wall came out, it was a turning point for me. I was in high school at the time, and I remember that music had always been my friend -- a companion, the brother I didn't have, or whatever. I came from a broken home. I was alone a lot as a child. And when The Wall came out, that record seemed very personal to me, even though I was in a completely different lifestyle, place, and situation than Roger would have been at the time. I'd never heard music that had that sort of honest, naked emotion. I had that sense of "Wow, I'm not the only person who feels this way." When it came time to start writing my own music, after some failed attempts at generic lyrics, I realized that if I went inward and took journal entries and turned them into songs, it seemed to strike a chord in others. And then when I made my second album, The Downward Spiral, I aspired to start with a story. I tried to write songs that fit into the slots in the plot line. I soon realized how hard that is. I tried to abandon it. But when I got toward the end of the record, I realized that I had kind of done that anyway -- what I thought I couldn't do.

Roger Waters: Forgive me, Trent, I don't know your work. I tend not to listen to rock and roll very much -- if at all. But it sounds to me as if what you're doing fulfills all the functions that you've described in my work. So there are still those kids on farms in the middle of Pennsylvania yearning to find some meaning in their lives and discovering it -- some of them at least -- in music that could be described as underground, or at least not in that mainstream of popular culture.

Revolver: Both of you have adopted the full-length concept album as your main medium. You tend to make large statements about the human condition in your work. What is it like to do that in the current musical climate, so characterized by disposability, one-off hit singles, and short attention span?

Trent Reznor: It's very difficult, as I've discovered with my most recent record, The Fragile. It's a double album, and it's pretty dense. It takes about five or so listenings to really get into it. As a fan, that's what I want when I buy a record -- to dig in and go several layers deep. That's the thing about your work, Roger. If you look deeper, you find things.

Roger Waters: But not everybody wants to go that deep.

Trent Reznor: I fully understand that, too. And I think that there's something to be said for a nice, appealing surface. But when you want to go looking for a deeper meaning, it ought to be there too. But nobody seems to have the time for that anymore. I guess from hiding in my studio for the past five years, making The Fragile, I wasn't quite aware how disposable the scene has become. It's a tough blow to withstand -- just the way commercialism has turned music more into product than art. You're judged immediately by the first three weeks of sales. And if it isn't what somebody at the record label said it would be, then it's a failure.

Roger Waters: But don't you think it was always that way? All record companies are profit-oriented. The holy grail for them is to discover the motherlode of popular taste, in order that they should move huge numbers of product. And they were always that way, in my view. Ahmet Ertegun* or anybody else. You know, there are these mythic kind of figures from the early days, like Sam Phillips. But Sam Phillips wouldn't have stuck with Elvis if people hadn't bought the records!

Trent Reznor: But are the record companies really catering to what the public taste is? Or do they, to a degree, dictate the taste to the public? MTV pumps out their boy bands and their generic blonde teenage icons to the masses. And I wonder how much of that is their public crying, "What are we supposed to like?" And they're bombarded with that.

Roger Waters: I'm sure you're right. MTV is pure Big Brother. It's pure Brave New World. And there's no question but that those who make decisions about the way society works become the arbiters of the quality of human life. In North America, the general trend has been this: You find a piece of wilderness. If there are people or animals living on it, you kill them. Then you build a strip mall that contains a number of the most obviously successful and recognizable icons of the culture you're trying to spread over the land. So inevitably, there's a McDonald's, a Sam Goody, and all those things.

I assume the reason for this is that it's convenient for the policy makers. It provides them with a system where there's plenty of cream floating around the top to be skimmed off. And I suppose the reason the human race goes along with it is that, as of yet, we don't know any better. That seems to be enough for most human beings. Although, if you ask most people, they don't actually feel a great satisfaction in their lives, buying that dream.

It's interesting, Trent, that you should be voicing these concerns about this kind of stuff. I find myself not caring about that, really, or about the way the record industry is or what's going to happen to it. Maybe that's very selfish of me. But it may be that that wall of concern is almost necessary to some of the rest of us, in order that we should have a reference point to develop against.

Revolver: Speaking of the demands of the marketplace, you are both in the midst of preparing DVDs of your recent tours. What is it like to encapsulate something like a rock and roll tour in this new medium?

Trent Reznor: Roger, is your DVD basically your live show?

Roger Waters: Yeah, it's the live show -- and a documentary, if we can get it all on. Well, actually, we can't get it all on. So I'm trying at the moment to persuade the record company to give the documentary away with the rest of the stuff. This particular DVD can be only two-and-a-half hours long, and our show is two-and-a-half hours long. So I'm under a lot of pressure to edit it -- take stuff out.

Trent Reznor: Make your product more appealing to the marketplace?

Roger Waters: Yeah, exactly. We were under that pressure with the live album of the shows, as well. "You should really put this out as a single CD, because it's more marketable." And I confess I did have a look at editing. I wrote a few song lists and thought, "I can't do this. This is ridiculous." So we persuaded the record company to sell a double CD at a reasonable price. I think live albums should be much less expensive that studio albums. The costs of making a live album are minimal compared to a studio album. You just take a mobile to two or three gigs, record them, and choose the best bits.

Trent Reznor: That's the focus of this one. And I'm taking a very hands-on approach. In the past I've made the mistake of hiring "the guys who really know how to do this." What happens is your concert footage winds up looking like everyone else's. So for this one, we got seven good digital video cameras and filmed the last 10 shows of the tour from seven different perspectives -- some locked-off shots, some hand-held, a lot from the audience -- to give a sense of what it was like to be there, in a non-professional kind of way. We adopted that same kind of attitude in post production too. We thought we would edit here in my studio on a Mac in Final Cut Pro. That led to, "Maybe we could adapt our studio for 5.1 Surround Sound," which we ended up doing. There have been a lot of hassles, but it's also been very educational.

Roger Waters: You're lucky enough to be in a position where you can make those choices, which is great.

Trent Reznor: Well, the timeline might be running out on that, given the sales of my last record. But I'm trying to keep as much in-house as possible. You see, I had a really bad experience with the first record label I was signed to. And when I finally got out of that situation and onto a new label, I said, "Here's the deal. You give me a chunk of money and I'll give you a record. I don't want A&R. I don't want any interference. I'll give you magazine ads. I'll give you a video. I don't want your help." So that provided me with an in-house situation where I could do what I want without meddling fingers from record label strangers.

And now I'm trying to get this DVD done to meet what is a pretty unrealistic deadline. And trying to get my head around the fact that almost nobody is ever going to listen to this with the right setup. Most people can't set a stereo up, let alone six speakers with the right level balance and the right distance between speakers.

Roger Waters: I actually think you're fighting a losing battle, trying to recreate anything like the experience of being at a rock and roll show with a DVD. Basically, they're home movies. I regret not having made home movies of The Pros and Cons of Hitch Hiking and the Radio K.A.O.S. tours (1984 and '87, respectively). And I'm so glad that I will have a home movie of the 2000 In The Flesh tour. I want to have it to put in a cupboard somewhere and maybe show it to my grandchildren. But I don't know if it's something that interests me that much, I have to say. I don't really care about it. Frankly, I'd rather be fishing. Or reading. But you know, I'm 56 years old. How old are you?

Trent Reznor: 35.

Roger Waters: So it's kind of relative. There's 21 years' difference. I might have cared more when I was 35. Not that I'm saying that you will eventually achieve fishing.

Trent Reznor: I'm looking forward to it, actually.

Roger Waters: But from the tenor of this conversation, it sounds like you're more involved in this stuff than I am.

Trent Reznor: I suppose I can't help it. My first record came out 10 years ago. It unexpectedly touched a nerve. The second record got 10 times bigger than we ever thought it was going to be. We just happened to be in the right place at the right time, It propelled us 20 levels higher than we should have been, really.

Roger Waters: You mean 20 levels more popular.

Trent Reznor: Yeah. You find yourself being referenced by popular culture now.

Roger Waters: Well, you do. But you can either choose to reference yourself like that, or not. And we all chose to do that, to a certain extent. If you're in rock and roll, you have to accept that part of the reason why you're there is because you like being patted on the back. Probably didn't get enough of it when you were a kid. That's certainly true of me. If we didn't have those needs we wouldn't be in rock and roll anyway.

Trent Reznor: That's true. But I disappeared for five years to get my brain straightened out. I came back with a really dense double album that I think is the best I can really do. But it's substantially different from what I've done in the past. It's not as obvious. And it sold well, but it didn't sell great. So now I'm settling into this... When I first started out, I'd ride around the country in a van 10 times if I needed to. I'd do interviews all day if I needed to...

Roger Waters: But you sound confused by this, slightly.

Trent Reznor: Well, I'm getting over the hump of realizing that I'm settling into what is right for me, artistically. But it might not be accessible for mass consumption.

Roger Waters: Well, okay. So it's not. So you've recognized that. All you need to do is recognize it and then forget about it. I think the one thing we all have to understand is that you can't go chasing the audience. That would be a living death for anyone who is serious about what they do. It sounds like you're agonizing about this stuff. And this is now me being wise after the event. But at the end of the day, I've had to understand that all you can do is your work. Maybe nobody will buy any of it. That could happen. You might make a record five years down the road and four people will buy it, you know?

Trent Reznor: Right.

Roger Waters: Modigliani** never sold any pictures. Van Gogh peddled his pictures for a bowl of soup. Some of these geniuses never got any reward at all in their lifetimes. Except the reward that comes from doing your own work and understanding your connection with the mathematics of life, or God, or whatever you want to call it.

Trent Reznor: That's obvious to me. But it's really nice to hear you say that.

Roger Waters: I've been through some of the same things, clearly. I've had a couple of big hit singles in my life, when I was with Pink Floyd. And I feel good about the work that I've done since then, particularly Amused to Death (1992). I've sold a few records. Not big numbers. But that's just the way it is. The cool thing is the moment when you put that last brush stroke to the painting, stand back, and go "Ahhhh." You know you've done good work. That's all you can expect.

Revolver: All these concerns about how your work is received by the public -- do they become more acute, more stressful, when you're touring?

Roger Waters: Not any more for me. On my last tour the audiences were ages 15 through 50, but more 20-year-olds than anything else, as far as I could see. And they knew the songs. They like them. The songs have meaning to them. It was kind of a warm, touchy-feely experience for me. And I'm ashamed to say that I loved it. I'm now in a state emotionally where I can recognize, absorb, and enjoy that connection with the audience. Whereas maybe 10 or 15 years ago I couldn't. Because I was still essentially the tall guy in black, standing in the corner scowling at everyone: "Stay away. Leave me alone."

Trent Reznor: I know that guy.

Roger Waters: And I don't feel like that now. So it was fun. And we have really good relationships within the band, so I wasn't going through all that muck I went through with Pink Floyd.

Trent Reznor: It's gotta feel good to look out and see an audience of some young people who are just discovering your music, realizing that it has a timeless quality to it.

Roger Waters: It's great. We're only just beginning to discover that about rock and roll. It didn't really start until the mid-Fifties, so it's still a very young thing. And it may be that some of us will eventually turn into Duke Ellington or Louis Armstrong. The artists involved in rock and roll only have to get old enough for people to say, "Hey, what a big surprise. They lasted. It wasn't just an overnight teenage rebellion. It was jazz!"

So there's room for what you and I do, Trent, and there's room for the boy bands and all the soft porn that's out there masquerading as rock and roll. Actually, it doesn't masquerade as rock and roll. It calls itself pop music. And I guess it was always that way.

Revolver: Do either of you resent being portrayed in the media as gloomy purveyors of depressing music?

Trent Reznor: When Nine Inch Nails got big, I got labeled as the most gloomy person in the world. I realized in time that my own self image was starting to become what I'd read about myself. Or how I was being treated by people around me, who only knew what they'd read about me. So it became a self-fulfilling prophecy, because there was no time for rational thought amidst the madness of touring and not having a home. No time to get a perspective of how my life was changing -- from poverty to wealth, from obscurity to being some sort of icon. In the end, it took some time to say, "Okay, who is really underneath all these layers of shit that have been built up?" From that point on, you realize that the media's just a game. The celebrity thing means nothing to me. It's more of an irritant than anything else.

Roger Waters: About the time Pink Floyd really got popular -- which was after Dark Side of the Moon (1972) and during The Wall, I guess -- I just distanced myself from everything. On the Animals tour (1977) and the one before that we had a publicist, and his job was to say no (i.e., to interview requests). Just politely say no to everything. I did that for years and years. Looking back on those days, I'm so glad I refused to do The Tonight Show, refused to speak to Barbara Walters or do the covers of magazines. Particularly the chat show TV thing. I think if you start doing that stuff, you're saying to people, "Okay I'm yours. Take me." But hey, guys, il faut partir. I must go.

Revolver: Thanks for doing this, Roger.

Roger Waters: Hey, it's been a pleasure. And nice talking to you, Trent.

Trent Reznor: Really nice.

Roger Waters: Now I'm going to have to buy one of your records to see who you are.

Trent Reznor: Maybe I'll even send you one.

Roger Waters: That would be great. Why not all of them? That would be good. I look forward to hearing them.


Footnote:

* Co-founder and current chairman of Atlantic Records, Turkish immigrant Ahmet Ertegun has for more than 50 years been one of the most influential figures in the worlds of rock, jazz, and R&B.

** Italian artist Amedeo Modigliani (1884-1920) developed a unique style characterized by an elongation of form and a purity of line that went largely unrecognized during a short lifetime plagued by poverty and disease.

 
< Prev   Next >
Brain Damage on Facebook Follow Brain Damage on Twitter Brain Damage's YouTube channel
Pink Floyd Calendar

Next 30 concerts

Pink Floyd on iTunes
Behind The Wall book
Pink Floyd: Backstage book
HeYou Floyd Fanzine - order details
www.Brain-Damage.co.uk - the Pink Floyd, Nick Mason, David Gilmour
and Roger Waters news & info site
All content except where noted otherwise is © Brain Damage/Matt Johns 2021.
Please see 'About Brain Damage' page for legal details and the small print!
Website generously designed and built by 3B Web Design